WINE OF THE MONTH- JUNE

Posted June 7, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Wine

Warm weather is here now (well, at least in most parts of the country not called Chicago), so I’ve recently been in a white wine mood. I suppose it started when I was in Greece, where I drank delicious bottles of house wine in the sun while overlooking the Santorini caldera, which if it isn’t the prettiest place I’ve been to in my life, it is certainly in the top three. Anyway, I’m back now (I think), and I’m ready to keep drinking white wine if the weather will maintain similar conditions. Recently, I had the chance to taste a bit “out of the box” if you will, and tried what I consider to be a fantastic Argentinian Chardonnay. This particular winery is famous in my world for its top level Malbec, which I consider to be among the best in the world year after year, so it is truly a testament to this Bodega that they also manage to exceed expectations in the white wine department as well.

catalt-ch-2003

CATENA ALTA CHARDONNAY MENDOZA 2006, $30, 91 Points, 2200 cases imported

Lots of soft vanilla, oak and pear on the nose that leads into a creamy body of pear, golden apple and delicious almond and hazelnut undertones. Creamy and smooth throughout the long finish with balanced acidity and almond lingering long past the citrus flavors.

Belmont Picks

Posted June 6, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Sports

This year’s Triple Crown has been one of the most interesting in recent memory, and the final leg is no exception. Always one of my favorite races due to the hilarity of the distance (very few other dirt races in America are ever run over 1 1/2 miles), this year’s Belmont Stakes poses several unanswered questions and also features the sport’s most unlikely potential future star in Derby winner and Preakness runner-up Mine That Bird. Briefly, here are some thoughts on how the race will unfold.

For starters, it is important to remember that just like the Derby, these horses will be running at a distance that they have never seen before (and will likely never see again). Therefore, past performance information is difficult to compare and must be interpreted, but simply can’t predict how these horses will handle the extra two furlongs beyond the Derby distance. An easy starting point is to look at pedigree. Interestingly, there is some serious Belmont history in the bloodlines of four of these horses:

Special attention should be paid to the sons of 2004 Belmont winner and Triple Crown spolier Birdstone, namely MINE THAT BIRD and SUMMER BIRD. Newcomer CHARITABLE MAN is lightly raced coming off an injury at the end of his two year old season, but his sire Lemon Drop Kid won this race in 1999 before going on to race very successfuly that fall. DUNKIRK’s sire Unbridled’s Song was injured as the favorite in the 1996 Kentucky Derby, and did not race in the Belmont. However, looking at his successive damsire line, we see three Belmont winners in A.P. Indy, Seattle Slew and Secretariat, which can’t be overlooked. I’ll use these four in my exotics.

DUNKIRK was my Derby win pick, and he finished in the middle of the pack in 11th place, but not without excuses. He fell out of the gate at the start and never looked comfortable, pinched closer to the pace than he would have liked and between horses, and clearly not taking a liking to the sloppy track. He still has the highest Beyer in field at 108 from his Florida Derby performance. I also think that even though the Derby didn’t go well for him, it added valuable seasoning for this otherwise lightly raced colt. He has the benefit of five weeks of rest since that race, and his tactical speed combined with his turn of foot and distance pedigree seems to fit perfectly here. He should have more room in this race and his long-striding running style is well-suited to the sweeping turns of Belmont Park.

MINE THAT BIRD proved in the Preakness that his Derby win was not a fluke, much to my surprise. He actually bettered his Derby Beyer in that race even in defeat as he posted a 106 after his 105 on the first Saturday in May. This makes him the only horse in the field with two Beyers over 100 and only one of two with a Beyer over 100. Charismatic jockey Calvin Borel has guaranteed victory in this race, but this isn’t his home track, and I still have questions about this colt’s running style in a race that is typically won from the first or second flight of horses. More importantly, I have questions about the toll that his massive overachievements in the first two legs of the Triple Crown have taken on this diminuative gelding; no horse has won the Derby, run second in the Preakness and then won the Belmont since 1963. Is this the guy to break that trend, which is longer than the Triple Crown drought??? That stat alone, along with his likely even money odds in this marathon (he was 50-1 just five weeks ago), makes me want to try to beat him, although it is important to note that of all of the horses to ever go into the Belmont after winning the Derby and finishing second in the Preakness, their Belmont record is 9-4-3-1-1. I can’t dismiss this guy based on that history, which gives him nearly an 80% chance of finishing in the top two.

SUMMER BIRD was probably the next most impressive closer in the finish of the Kentucky Derby to the winner, as he closed strongly to finish sixth and only gave up three lengths to his half-brother down the stretch, which is by far the best any horse did in that race based on that measure. Based on that closing kick and his pedigree, he’s my next favorite of the deep closers, and he seems to be vastly improving after getting five weeks of rest off of that Derby performance. Dismiss the sons of Birdstone at your own peril.

CHARITABLE MAN is the morning line second choice, and he’s worth trying to beat at those odds. He’s never gone more than 9f so a 12f race is an extremely tall order, but neither had Da Tara last year and he won easily on the lead. This year’s race is undeniably deeper with quality horses, but this colt does possess the type of running style that tends to factor in this race in a big way. Expect him to sit just off the pace and make a big run coming around the turn. I still question his ability to get the distance, not because of his pedigree which is obviously strong from that perspective, but simply because of his inexperience coming off of an injury that has sidelined him up until this leg of the Triple Crown. I wasn’t as enamored with his victory in the Peter Pan as others were, as his 98 Beyer simply doesn’t hold up here, but due to the pedigree and running style he scares me enough to keep him underneath in exotics.

CHOCOLATE CANDY and MR. HOT STUFF are both deep closers, and unless you have a kick similar to the one shown by Mine That Bird in his last two races, these types of horses are usually up against in the Belmont, as they tend to lose too much ground early behind a soft pace that never disintegrates. Of the two, I probabaly like Chocolate Candy more, as his game fifth place finish in the Derby merits a look, but he hung a bit in that race and wasn’t really closing ground as he made his move early in that race. Mr. Hot Stuff simply hasn’t shown me anything to get excited about, but based on pedigree he wouldn’t surprise to hit the board if he takes a step forward.

FLYING PRIVATE was impressive in his fourth place finish in the Preakness, but you have to think he will be really feeling some fatigue as he stretches out to 12f here after that and his last place finish in the Derby. MINERS ESCAPE will set the pace here along with BRAVE VICTORY, but there are enough speedy horses in this race that I doubt they will be able to get loose on the lead at soft fractions, and will likely fade out of the picture and be looking for the proverbial oxygen tank. LUV GOV is in over his head here at this distance by any reasonable measure.

PICKS SUMMARY:

  1. Dunkirk
  2. Mine That Bird
  3. Summer Bird
  4. Charitable Man
  5. Chocolate Candy
  6. Mr. Hot Stuff
  7. Flying Private
  8. Miner’s Escape
  9. Brave Victory
  10. Luv Gov

HOW TO BET $50 on the BELMONT STAKES

$5 Exacta Box: Dunkirk, Mine That Bird/ Dunkirk, Mine That Bird, Summer Bird, Charitable Man ($30)

$20 Place: Dunkirk

UNDERCARD PICKS:

WOODY STEPHENS

  1. This One’s For Phil
  2. Everyday Heroes
  3. Triumphant Flight

ACORN

  1. Justwhistledixie
  2. Casanova Move
  3. Gabby’s Golden Gal

WOODFORD RESERVE

  1. Court Vision
  2. Cosmonaut
  3. Cowboy Cal

Did I Mention That I’m Back From Greece?

Posted May 29, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Uncategorized

So I’m back now, and I’m experiencing serious vacation withdrawal. Here’s what I was doing a week ago:

IMG_1133

IMG_1154

IMG_1452

Now, I get to go to bed so that I can wake up and stand with a computer hanging around my neck in a gigantic room with no windows and lots of numbers on the walls while I yell, scream and try to make money. Sigh.

Oh well…have to earn the next vacation I guess!

WINE OF THE MONTH- MAY

Posted May 28, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Wine

I just returned from a wonderful 11 night trip to Europe in which my wife and I visited Rome, Sicily, Sorrento, Greece and Turkey by land and sea. We especially enjoyed our time aboard the brand new Celebrity Solstice cruise ship, which happens to offer a spectacular wine list. I decided to make this month a duel feature of two separate vintages of the same wine, both of which are still available. I tasted the most recent vintage at Sona in Los Angeles back in February and then again aboard the ship, and also had quite a good amount of the older vintage aboard the ship as well! I prefer the more recent vintage, but felt that since both are still out there and plentiful, I might as well give special attention to both. Generally, anything produced in Barossa Valley is worth tasting, but this wine consistently delivers at a somewhat lower price point.

Shiraz_main

PETER LEHMANN SHIRAZ BAROSSA VALLEY 2005, $15, 89 Points, 22,000 cases produced

Loaded with vanilla and red fruit on the nose. Supple red cherry, perfumed fruit and hints of earthy roasted beet and peppery spice come together to form deep structure on the palate and linger long.

PETER LEHMANN SHIRAZ BAROSSA VALLEY 2006, $15, 90 Points, 26,400 cases produced

Lots of dark red fruit and vanilla bean on the nose. Ripe but dark raspberry and black cherry flavors above notes of pomegrante carry through the dark chocolate and understated pepper spice, a less aggressive but suave style. Full and leathery throughout the impressive finish.

Early Preakness Picks

Posted May 13, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Sports

I know that the posts haven’t been drawn yet, but I’m going to have to give this an early try anyway. I’m pleased to report that I am leaving for a ten night cruise to Southern Italy and Greece tomorrow afternoon, so I won’t be able to complete a full analysis- it’s even possible that I won’t get to watch the race! That might be the only downside to this trip, which my wife and I have been anxiously awaiting for over six months now. At first glance, this Preakness looks even more interesting than the Derby. You have the top four finishers from the first Saturday in May, the best three-year-old filly to come along in over a decade (and maybe ever), speedy stakes winners that skipped the Derby and have been pointing to this, and, lest we forget, the forgotten favorite of the Derby. It’s going to be one of the strongest Preakness fields in recent memory, which is great to see after the absurdity of last year’s challengers to Big Brown. As briefly as possible, I’ll go over how I see the race shaping up.

As a preface, while I’ve gained a lot of respect for the Derby winner Mine That Bird and have made my apologies, I think he’s a strong play against here, even though I think he could go off as low as the fourth or fifth choice in the race (when was the last time that happened??) He isn’t likely to benefit from the shortened distance or the probable fast track, and suffice to say that if there’s ever been a bounce candidate, (2 weeks of rest off a 25 point Beyer jump) he is it.

Speedy newcomers BIG DRAMA and TAKE THE POINTS should battle for the lead early with the former getting the better of the latter, who should fade out of the picture fairly quickly after what I expect to be much faster fractions than we saw in the Derby. Directly behind, in perfect stalking position, I expect to see the trio of female monster RACHEL ALEXANDRA, injured but quickly recovered Derby favorite FRIESAN FIRE, and the very game PAPA CLEM. All three have great tactical speed and should be in great shape if they can rate off the pace a bit. Settling in behind, I’d again expect to see Derby runner-up PIONEER OF THE NILE closer than he probably should be, but he proved me very wrong in his impressive performance two weeks ago. MUSKET MAN will be saving ground in stalking position, and while he has continued to outrun his pedigree, you have to figure that this race will be asking a lot from him two weeks after a major over-achievement in the Derby.  GENERAL QUARTERS will fall back a bit behind into the next big flight along with some of my throwouts, which include FLYING PRIVATE, LUV GOV and TONE IT DOWN. I like the General the most of that group, although I still just don’t think he is fast enough, and he proved me right in the Derby, a race that was ripe for the taking for his running style and slop pedigree. Falling well behind the pace will be Derby winner MINE THAT BIRD and the underrated TERRAIN.

The big question here is how long BIG DRAMA will last. Given that he is unraced past 7f and only has one start this year, I don’t like his chances as much as some do, especially since his pedigree doesn’t scream “distance.” However, his speed is undeniable, and I expect him to lead most of the way but would be surprised if he isn’t overtaken by some of the more experienced stalkers. With smart races, RACHEL ALEXANDRA and FRIESAN FIRE should explode past him and have a lot left in the tank for the stretch. Keep in mind that the Oaks winner, while winning by over 20 lengths in a romp, wasn’t exactly overexerted against that weak field, and that the Derby fave was eased down the stretch after an impossibly bad trip. In both cases, these horses should be in great shape from a conditioning standpoint, inasmuch as that they shouldn’t be exhausted from having to come back after two weeks. PIONEER OF THE NILE should be right on their tails, but I still don’t think that he has the stretch kick to overtake horses that he isn’t already eyeballing, which he won’t be. With a likely hot pace, some horses will be tiring, and I expect PAPA CLEM and MUSKET MAN to be the prime candidates, with TERRAIN and MINE THAT BIRD flying down the stretch. The difference here in my opinion will be the fact that unlike the Derby, where the three horses at the front of the pack seemed to come to a virtual halt in the final furlong, I expect RACHEL ALEXANDRA to be flying, with FRIESAN FIRE right there, but probably missing the slop a bit and hating the extra hald a furlong a bit as well.

RA-Oaklawn-040509-9-6-S

Picks Summary:

  1. Rachel Alexandra
  2. Friesan Fire
  3. Pioneer of the Nile
  4. Big Drama
  5. Papa Clem
  6. Mine That Bird
  7. Musket Man
  8. Terrain
  9. General Quarters
  10. Luv Gov
  11. Flying Private
  12. Take the Points
  13. Tone It Down

Tasting Report- Spanish Wines

Posted May 10, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Wine

Almost exactly a year ago, I posted an extensive recap of the Spanish wines I had tasted over a month or so between my trip to Spain and at various tastings. A year later, I still find myself turning to Spanish wines almost more than any other due to the combination of value and quality that is difficult to find anywhere else in the world. Whether you want a bargain table wine for $10 or a world class wine for just over $100, this dynamic, diverse wine producing nation is hitting on all cylinders. Here’s a quick look at what I’ve enjoyed the most recently. If you pay close attention to last year’s post, you’ll notice a few of the higher end wines that have benefited score-wise from having an extra year in the bottle.

TOP TEN WINES FOR VALUE (under $50):

1. Bodegas Alto Moncayo Garnacha 2006 , 94 Points, $45: Deep, expressive aromas of toast, leather, tar, smoked game/beef and dark red fruits. Dense body with depth of flavor showcasing complex dark plum, black licorice, perfume and complex smoke and orange peel citrus, but dominated by a distinctive coffee note, leather and hints of black pepper. Monsterous, long finish. A blockbuster offering.

2. Costers del Priorat Pissares 2005, 92 Points, $25: Delicate, creamy nose and body of red cherry, vanilla bean and red licorice with undertones of subtle floral, smoke and chocolate notes. Complex and elegant, smooth as can be through the long finish.

3. Condado de Haza Ribera del Duero Crianza 2005, 91 Points, $30: Rich and perfumey on the nose with lots of blackberry and black cherry fruit above an impressive powdery cocoa note on the palate. Hints of smoke and mineral intertwine and chocolate charcter lingers with lots of juicy dark fruits through the long length.

4. Emilio Moro Tinto Ribera del Duero 2005, 91 Points, $35: Typical smokiness on the nose above dark plum and black cherry nuances. Full and rich, with minerality pumping along with dark plum and cherry above notes of chocolate and espresso. Muscular, with a blast of campfire smoke through the long finish.

5. Bodegas Juan Gil Jumilla 2006, 89 Points, $15: Nose of mineral, red fruit and subtle tobacco spice. Deep, powdery texture with blackberry, black cherry and licorice above strong earth and mineral, tobacco spice and a blast of tannin through the deep, complex length. Monastrell.

6. Artadi Vinas Gain Rioja 2006, 89 Points, $28: Intriguing combination of toasty vanilla and plummy black fruit on the nose. Fairly ripe purple fruit here- plums, figs and violety floral notes above light caramel and burnt toast, oak and mineral. Lots going on here through the long finish, fairly deep Rioja, but showing quite well for its youth.

7. Finca de Luzon Jumilla 2005, 88 Points, $15: Vivid plum and blackberry fruit on the nose along with hints of mocha powder. Well-balanced body of sweet blackberry and plum fruit with pleasant chocolate notes and hints of cola. Medium length, well-integrated tannins. Monastrell, Tempranillo and Cabernet Sauvignon.

8. Bodegas Izadi Vetus Toro 2005, 88 Points, $20: Inviting nose with floral hints and notes of citrus above red fruit and smokey hints. Medium-bodied with cherry fruit and a decisive floral note which evolves into a blast of mineral and smoke on the finish. Very tannic still, but complex and layered.

9. Bodegas Atteca Old Vines Garnacha Catalayud 2007, 88 Points, $15: Smoky and toasty aromas with ripe red fruits. Very fruit forward and ripe, with flavors of cherry, lavender, violet and blueberry. Light undertones of toasty spice, oak and ends with a minerally note.

10. Bodegas Atteca Garnacha de Fuego Old Vines 2007, 87 Points, $8: Slightly jammy nose of raspberry with undertones of cherry and mineral. Fleshy body of lively raspberry, red licorice and cherry fruit, layers of mineral and vanilla bean linger underneath with impressive spiciness through the finish, red licorice lingers longest.

TOP TEN HIGH-END WINES:

1. El Nido Jumilla 2006, 97 Points, $120: Deep, complex nose of caramel, orange peel, minerally perfume and blackberry/ cassis fruit. Extraordinary mouthfeel of constantly evolving black fruit, deep caramel, cocoa, cedary spice, leather and orange peel citrus notes. Finish lingers for minutes, firm tannins carry the dark fruit, spice and cocoa nuances for miles. Such depth, complexity and balance here, I can’t ask for much more in a wine. Long one of my favorite wines in the world, and this is the best vintage they’ve ever made. 70% Cabernet Sauvignon, 30% Monastrell.

2. Bodegas Muga Torre Muga Rioja 2004, 95 Points, $90: Complex nose of perfumey blackberry, licorice and violet with notes of smoky bacon and mineral. Delcious, elegantly balanced body of black cherry, blackberry and dark plum fruit and a backbone of silky vanilla, cocoa and exotic spice that evolves into a long, chalky length. Perfumey and fruity initially and then spicy and minerally through the long length, this is about as good as Rioja gets. Smooth, silky and seamless.

3. Bodegas y Vinedos Maurodos San Roman Toro 2004, 93 Points, $60: Almost sweet on the nose, with plum cake spice and notes of cola. Plush, amazing mouthfeel of elegant plum, blackberry and sweet spice and floral notes pumping through. Elegant and complex, long finish with only a hint of dryness.

4. Emilio Moro Malleolus de Valderramiro Ribera del Duero 2005, 93 Points, $160: Deep, almost tarry black fruit and oak is very elegant on the nose, hints of smoke and burnt toast add intrigue. Dark, smokey body with notes of smoked meat dominating subtle blackberry notes. Incredibly soft and smooth mouthfeel, this is all about depth, as light hints of earthy mineral and mocha cry for food through the long finish.

5. Mas Doix Velles Vignes Priorat 2005, 92 Points, $125: Lifted by its eucalyptus perfume and pepperminty violet aromas, almost inky black and purple fruits and spiced rum nuances. Soft mouthfeel of juicy dark plum, black licorice, and blackberry fruits here with notes of cedary spice and a hint of cocoa. Deep, perfumey and elegant through the long length, finishing with a raisiny, rummy note. Grenache and Carignan blend.

6. Huerta de Albala Tarberner #1 Cadiz, 92 Points, $90: Smoky, gamey and leathery aromas with lots of graphite above red currant fruit nuances. Floral, gamey flavors evolve into red cherry, blackberry, licorice and plum fruit, and hints of strong leather, black pepper and chocolate show up in the fantastic length. Layered and complex throughout a creamy texture, chocolate covered cherry flavors linger long. Syrah.

7. Dominio de Pingus Flor de Pingus Ribera del Duero 2006, 92 Points, $80: Complex combination of perfumey black fruit, smoked meat and chocolate on the nose. Subdued fruit but deep flavors, with smokey meat and leather above some blackberry notes that are complemented by tar and dark chocolate. Deep, smooth and smokey, yum!

8. Alvaro Palacios Finca Dofi Priorat 2005, 91 Points, $85: Vibrant nose of floral elements, hints of violet, orange peel, caramel and mineral. Elegant body of red currant fruits, rose petal and undertones of caramel and mineral. Long length without any jamminess. Refreshing, well-balanced and delicious blend. Has gained some complexities, with hints of earth and darker black cherry and blackberry fruit underneath with chocolate and black pepper spice. Stony, wet limestone mineral lingers. Grenache, Carignan, Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon.

9. Bodegas Aalta Tinto Ribera del Duero 2005, 90 Points, $60: Dark aromas of black fruit, chocolate and green earth. Very deep body, with hints of tar, leather and coffee shading the black fruit notes through the impressive finish. Lots of grip here from the tannins, cries for food.

10. Bodegas Luzon Alma de Luzon Jumilla 2004, 89 Points, $60: Wet, minerally, almost inky black fruit aromas with hints of earth and oak. Slightest hint of green pepper earth initially leads into deep blackberry fruit and hints of toasty chocolate, ending with a blast of minerally spice. Very deep and elegant, only complaint here is that the green earth notes tend to overshadow the fruit through the finish. 70% Monastrell, 30% Cabernet Sauvignon.

Oops! Mine That Bird wins Kentucky Derby

Posted May 3, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Sports

Wow! Well that’s an entire week of my life that I’ll never get back. Since I know I am not alone here on my handicapping analysis of the Derby winner, and because I’m man enough to admit when I am very, very wrong, here’s what I wrote three days ago about Mine That Bird’s chances to win this race:

MINE THAT BIRD (Birdstone- Mining My Own/ Smart Strike), PP#8, 81 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: I can’t really think of any. Finished fourth at Sunland Park last time out, and was twelfth in the BC Juvenile last fall against some of these.

Cons: Really, really seems overmatched here. Observers of his workouts note that he could possibly be “mentally challenged.” He’s the longest shot in the field for good reason. His top Beyer of 81 is abysmal.

Conclusion: The perfect example of Derby Fever, as this horse has no business running against the rest of these. He’s just another body to create a meaningless traffic jam. Reason number 10,000 that the field should be cut down.

Harsh, huh? I almost feel like Mine that Bird read this blog last night before he went to bed and got really, really pissed off. First, let’s take a step back and realize that is a monumental upset- the highest priced winner of the Kentucky Derby in 96 years. Yes, bigger than Giacomo. The $2 Superfecta paid $550,000! Besides, with Giacomo, there were actual reasons to play him based on closing speed that he had demonstrated in prior races. With Mine That Bird, there simply is no handicapping angle whatsoever that could have led to the conclusion that he had any chance to even hit the board in this race, let alone win it. Also, in 2005 when Giacomo pulled the upset, that race completely fell apart, with Spanish Chestnut running a blazing :45.0 half mile and burning out the rest of the field that tried to stay close to that pace. This time, if anything, the pace was slower than I expected as Join in the Dance plodded along through the slop in :47.2. This should have meant that the other three horses near the lead, Pioneer of the Nile, Papa Clem and Regal Ransom, should have battled it out for the win and that all of the closers were in big trouble if they were too far from the pace. (I would have been wrong in that event too). But somehow, some way, jockey Calvin Borel was able to make a move from last place that was nearly identical to the move he made two years ago to win this race aboard Street Sense.

This was a strange day. As soon as I Want Revenge scratched, all of a sudden I was uneasy about my picks. The whole undercard showed no consistency on the slop and I got my face ripped off–early on it would seem that speed was going to hold, and then a closer would come out of nowhere to win a race. Favored Friesan Fire was bumped around early and never got into position, and he was eventually eased to finish second to last. My pick, Dunkirk, stumbled badly out of the gate and probably overcompensated after that, finding himself too close to the leaders and with nothing left to make the final move I expected. Desert Party was wide the whole way, way too close to the pace, and tired, and aside from those three, who really was a surprise to finish poorly? What looked like one of the deepest Derbys in years turned into an incredibly shallow, wide open race over the course of the last week. It really is a shame that we didn’t get to see I Want Revenge or Quality Road in this one, not to mention The Pamplemousse or Old Fashioned, but the race was so bizarre that I’m not even sure if their presence would have changed the outcome. Blame the slop, blame the bumping, or blame the overall strangeness, but just like 98% of the betting public, I still went home with an empty wallet.

So I suppose it was only right that it would end on a strange note. Watch the replay of the race again, and listen to Tom Durkin’s call. Durkin is among the best in the world at calling horse races, yet he failed to even recognize the fact that Mine That Bird had taken the lead until he was nearly three lengths clear of Pioneer of the Nile and driving towards the wire in a romp! He barely was able to make the call of the winner before the horse crossed the wire, and the legitimate shock in his voice at that moment is telling, and classic. If that isn’t testament to how shocking this was, than I don’t know what is. It certainly wasn’t Durkin’s best call of his career (it was arguably his worst), but it fit right in with the outcome, and I definitely had no idea who that horse was driving down the rail either as it happened.

minethatbird5-2

In conclusion, I’m sorry Mine That Bird, for saying those mean things about you. You clearly deserved the spot in the field, and I guess I can no longer argue that the field size should be reduced. And I now realize that you just pretended to be a retarded horse during your workout last week to drive up your odds, you little hustler. My wife noticed how little and cute you were during the post parade. Next year I’ll just let her pick my Derby winner for me during the parade and thereby save myself hundreds of hours of work.

Although I can’t promise you’ll see your name on any of my Preakness tickets.

Additional notes:

- The Apollo Curse still stands, but aside from that, every meaningful statistic or trend that ever existed for evaluating a Kentucky Derby winner is now effectively hogwash. Don’t even get me started on the 100 Beyer rule. How about a 90 Beyer? Mine That Bird barely broke 80 on his best day prior to today’s race. And no horse has ever won the Derby with a dosage figure as high as Mine That Bird’s is. He was actually the only horse in the field with a higer dosage than 4.00, one of many reasons he was overlooked by me and handicappers everywhere. It just goes to show that like in any sport, on any give day, anything can happen.

- I can’t help but point out the pedigree of Mine That Bird and its history of heartbreak in Triple Crown events. Most recently, his sire Birdstone defeated the beloved Smarty Jones in the 2004 Belmont to stop his quest for the Triple Crown. Before that, his grand sire Grindstone nipped Cavonnier at the wire in the 1996 Derby in a photo finish. And now this. Evil, evil line of horses. But you can bet that I’ll be paying more attention to them going forward.

- You can’t end a post about this weekend without mentioning the most impressive performance of the Derby events, and that was by Rachel Alexandra, winning the Oaks in dramatic fashion by some 20 lengths. Keep you eye on this one, as she appears to be a once in a generation type talent, and has put herself squarely in the race for Horse of the Year.

Kentucky Derby Preview and Analysis

Posted April 30, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Sports

Post positions have been drawn for the 135th Kentucky Derby. As I look over this field, I can’t help but feel like this is one of the deepest fields we’ve seen in many years, and then pause to ponder what it could have been without the injuries to Quality Road, The Pamplemousse, Old Fashioned and Midshipman. Wow. Still, there is no clear cut favorite, and there is a handful of horses with a strong shot to make it onto the board or into the superfecta. Having said that, I am almost 100% certain that the winner of this race will be one of four horses. You’ll have to read the whole article (or at least scroll to the bottom) to find out which four, but if you are a big speed figure guy like I am, it should be fairly obvious who three of the four I am talking about are, and the other is more of a mystery horse that has been training impressively and looks like the whole package. To me, two horses tower over this field by any paper measure you can put together. Both of them have their own question marks and reasons to play against, but trends keep falling every year. The other two appear too tough to ignore as well, but I am incredibly confident that one of my four will win the Kentucky Derby.

A quick word on figures: Over the last 25 runnings of the Kentucky Derby, the winning horse has posted a previous-best Beyer over 100 on 23 of those runnings. This is not a coincidence, and that 100 Beyer threshold is a key number in my mind. Admittedly, the switch to synthetic racing (especially at Santa Anita) makes this measure a bit less of a disqualifier, as some horses move up by double digits after they switch to dirt, and it certainly seems that the synthetic speed figures always come in lower. Nevertheless, it helps to eliminate some of the horses that have run only on dirt, and forces careful attention to the synthetic horses as they work on the Churchill dirt. My pick to win last year, Colonel John, was a perfect example of this, and his form reminds me a lot of a certain horse in this field (again, you’ll have to keep reading). Despite the fact that he’d never earned a Beyer higher than the 95 he earned on a synthetic course, I still liked him, as he devoured the dirt at Churchill in his pre-race workouts, and I really felt that he would flourish at ten furlongs based on his strong classic distance pedigree. I expected him to improve by at least ten Beyer points.

The Colonel ran a strong race through an unenviable trip to finish a non-threatening sixth, and I didn’t cash a single ticket (although I did have a Big Brown-Denis of Course exacta that just missed). As a result of this lingering goose egg, my speed figure radar is on high alert this Derby season. Some additional statistics of note in regard to Beyer speed figures:

- The average previous best Beyer of the last 16 Kentucky Derby winning horses is 106.8.

- The average Beyer earned by the winner of the last 16 Kentucky Derbys is 109.0.

- Interestingly, only 6 of the last 16 Kentucky Derby winners have been the horse with the top Beyer in the field: (Big Brown, Street Sense, War Emblem, Fusaichi Pegasus, Charismatic, Lil E Tee). This is noteworthy on two accounts. For one, this seems to indicate that more often than not, the horse with the top Beyer in the field bounces off that effort, while horses above 100  but below the top level seem to improve off their last effort and overtake that horse. Secondly, in years that front-running types have posted surprise wins (War Emblem, Charismatic, Lil E Tee), their Beyer figures told the story beforehand, and the betting public was probably silly to send them off at such long odds with that information right in front of them. Years later, we now can use that hindsight to our own benefit. Like I always say, picking horses isn’t really that hard, you just have to pick the fastest horse in the field. Sometimes, under the right circumstances, these speed figures do all the work for you.

- Over the past 25 years, only four horses have posted two career Beyers over 110 before entering the Derby. They are:

  • Holy Bull in 1994: 115 Florida Derby, 113 Blue Grass. Holy Bull finished way behind in the Kentucky Derby, but went on to win several fall races and was eventually crowned Horse of the Year, and is widely regarded as one of the best racehorses of that decade.
  • Silver Charm in 1997: 110 San Vincente, 110 Santa Anita Derby. Silver Charm won the Kentucky Derby. He then went on the capture the Preakness Stakes two weeks later and the Dubai World Cup the following winter.
  • Indian Charlie in 1998: 112 Allowance, 111 Santa Anita Derby. Indian Charlie finished an impressive third as the favorite in the Kentucky Derby
  • Quality Road in 2009: 113 Fountain of Youth, 111 Florida Derby. Will not run- but it could be valuable to look closely at horses that have run close to him in his races, as he is surely a rare talent based on this statistic, and will be a force if he can make it back for the Preakness.

Here is another very interesting historical trend that I ran across, which I post more for comfort than anything else: seven of the last fourteen Derby winners have come from outside of post #14. That’s just a shocking stat, which I think points more toward the fact that the best horse wins regardless of his post than it does to the outside posts providing an advantage. This is an important differentiation to make, and it was never better exemplified than last year when Big Brown won easily after a six wide trip out of the #20 post.

Lastly, I wanted to talk a bit about pedigree. This becomes especially important in evaluating which horses should have the ability to improve by virtue of running an extra furlong, and which horses will find that task to be too daunting. Aside from looking at a horse’s sire, dam and damsire, which I provide for you below, it is important to look behind the immediate family for stamina influences. Looking at the sire line, I ran across a startling statistic: Horses from the Mr. Prospector line have won 8 of the last 14 Kentucky Derbys! This doesn’t narrow the field down too much since nearly half of the field is of that line, but it still is worth mentioning (includes Dunkirk, Pioneer of the Nile, Chocolate Candy, Desert Party, Papa Clem, Summer Bird, Regal Ransom and Flying Private). Meanwhile, the Bold Ruler line has not produced a Derby winner since Spectacular Bid in 1979. Horses from that line include I Want Revenge, Friesan Fire and General Quarters. Use that information as you will.

As always, I will break down this year’s running of the Kentucky Derby based on the likely pace scenario, and then analyze the pros and cons of each horse before coming to an overall conclusion. It is important to note that in my opinion the injuries to speedsters Quality Road, The Pamplemousse and Old Fashioned greatly change the complexion of this race from a pace perspective, and I actually expect the race to be run under even faster fractions now due to what I like to refer to as “the rabbit factor”. Nothing too crazy though- think :46 and change.

contender-image-default1PACE:

REGAL RANSOM (Distorted Humor- Kelli’s Ransom/ Red Ransom) PP#10, 100-102 Beyer Equivalent, 30-1 Morning Line

Pros: In all likelihood, he will be among the early pacesetters on Derby Day, and he has enough speed to separate himself from the field if no one opts to press the pace. He figures to dart right to the front off the flank of Join in the Dance, who will be on in his inside. His sire line boasts a great deal of distance and surface versatility, and he is also inbred to the Mr. Prospector line. If anything, he should benefit from being able to dictate the pace; although I don’t expect him to get away from this field very easily, he shouldn’t have much trouble being in front by the 6f mark. His workouts at Churchill have been outstanding, as he’s been speedy (:59.2 for 5f) and has handled the track perfectly.

Cons: To date, he hasn’t demonstrated an affinity for distance, and ten furlongs could be asking a lot from this one. The Derby is rarely won wire to wire, although this year does set up as a pace scenario where such a situation is conceivable if he can handle the extra distance. The overseas trip is always a concern, and there isn’t a lot to compare against here besides an abysmal 8th place finish at Santa Anita last year in his only race in the States. He’s also a “young” three-year old, as he won’t really turn three until May 26th, and that could prove a small disadvantage for him compared to the January yearlings.

Conclusion: It is worth mentioning that Godolphin has a long-standing Derby curse. More importantly, they took their sweet time deciding whether to enter this horse who is undeniably a go-t0-the-lead type. His inclusion now raises some questions as to how the race will set up, as Godolphin could conceivably use him to set hot rabbit-like fractions to aid stablemate closer Desert Party’s chances–or simply wire the field himself. If I’m Godolophin, I see this as a win-win situation. However, given that scenario, I like his chances to wire the field even less, and could see him fading way back after leading for the first mile. Even if that doesn’t happen, his likely distance questions lead me to look elsewhere. Also, looking back at horses that have wired the field in this race, they’ve often been among the fastest two or three horses in the field, and I don’t think Regal Ransom fits that bill. He’s likely to be a “wise guy” pick based on his impressive workouts, and he’s a huge overlay at 30-1, but I think I will be wiser to pass.

JOIN IN THE DANCE (Sky Mesa- Dance Darling/ Devil’s Bag ) PP#9, 90 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: He figures to be the main speed in the race, and it’s possible that Pletcher will plan to use him to set a hot pace and serve as a rabbit for Dunkirk. Coming out of the #9 post in the center of the track should put him to the lead quickly.

Cons: I give him virtually no chance to get the distance, but he will be an important part of the way the race plays out depending on how fast he wants to run the first quarter mile. His speed figures put him nowhere near contention, adding further validity to the idea that is he only in this race to strategically aid his stablemate.

Conclusion: I anticipate he’ll be in need to an oxygen tank after the first six furlongs, but his inclusion certainly makes the pace scenario a bit more interesting.

PAPA CLEM (Smart Strike- Miss Houdini/ Belong to Me) PP#7, 101 Beyer, 20-1 Morning Line

Pros: He was impressive in winning a hard fought stretch duel over Old Fashioned in the Arkansas Derby, which proves that he can rate and win, although one would think he’ll shoot for the lead in this one. He finished ahead of likely favorite I Want Revenge on the Pro-Ride track in the Robert B. Lewis at Santa Anita, but finished second to Pioneer of the Nile. In the Louisiana Derby, he demonstrated his front-running style and led most of the way over the slop before fading to finish a distant second to Friesan Fire.

Cons: He is going to have to get close to the lead and press the pace to have a chance here, and that could take a lot out of him.  Not much about his pedigree or performances to date indicates that he will benefit from the extra furlong. The 101 Beyer puts him in contention from a historical standpoint,  but there are horses in this race that have posted much faster figures, and he’s a huge bounce candidate after his last effort, which was a career best. Despite winning the Arkansas Derby, two other horses in that race ran the final 3/8 of a mile faster (:37.04, :12.26 final furlong). His last workout at Churchill was not very impressive, as onlookers observed that he looked tired and worn out coming home in a work that was widely regarded as one of the week’s worst.

Conclusion: It is hard to decide how close to the lead he will try to be, as he has shown versatility in his running style, but regardless, I just don’t see him getting the distance. His claim to fame seems to be beating I Want Revenge narrowly at the beginning of this year on a synthetic surface, but I don’t see him holding up against that one on the dirt, not to mention at the longer distance. Probably more disturbing was just how badly he was beaten by Friesan Fire in the Louisiana Derby–and I don’t care if the track was sloppy, that was a romp, plain and simple. And although the Arkansas Derby winner has had some success of late in this race, I feel like that field was very watered down this year, and Old Fashioned was running on three legs down the stretch.

JUST OFF THE PACE:

FRIESAN FIRE (A.P. Indy- Bollinger/ Dehere) PP#6, 104 Beyer, 5-1 Morning Line

Pros: He demonstrated tactical speed in winning the Louisiana Derby in blowout fashion over a sloppy track, but hasn’t raced since, and that was seven weeks ago, although the extra rest will probably serve to his benefit after that effort. The male side of his pedigree indicates that he should relish the distance (AP Indy’s 8.2f average winning distance is tops as a sire currently), although his female side is bred more for speed at shorter distances. His 104 Beyer is bested by only two horses in this field and puts him squarely in the conversation. Trainer Larry Jones has finished second in this race with Hard Spun and Eight Belles in the last two years, both after long layoffs and unorthodox training methods leading up to the race. After the ill-fated Eight Belles gutsy second place finish last year, he seems to be a sentimental pick, as you can’t help rooting for Jones. Sometimes karma matters. On a sloppy track, he figures to move up. His blowout work on Monday (5f in :57.4) was almost identical to Hard Spun’s last workout in 07, and that horse easily could have won that Derby if not for some great jockeying by Calvin Borel on Street Sense.

Cons: Jones has taken his usual strange approach to bringing his horses up to the Derby, which still raises concerns even though it has worked the past two years.. The seven week layoff poses some questions for this horse, but not as many as the fact that he’s never even raced up to nine furlongs before. His win in the Louisiana Derby was an impressive romp in a close-to-the-pace stalking trip, but did he benefit from the sloppy track that day? Also, he is of the Bold Ruler sire line, and no horse from that line has won the Kentucky Derby since Spectacular Bid in 1979. Despite his fast workout time, his gallop out was perplexing as he came to a virtual stop.

Conclusion: As much as I wanted to play against this horse as I simply have so many questions about a horse in this race that has never run 9f, two things changed my mind. First, I remembered that I dismissed Eight Belles last year because of that same issue, and that wound up biting me in the ass big time. Secondly, Monday’s work was just too identical to Hard Spun’s in 07 for me not to take notice, and despite picking the winner correctly that year, Hard Spun destroyed all of my exotics. I’d be foolish to make the same mistake for the third time. I don’t understand the methods Larry Jones uses to get his horses ready for the Derby, but that’s why he’s the horse trainer and I’m the options trader/ amatuer horse analyst. He’s not in my top three because I still think he’ll struggle to get the distance, but if he wins or hits the board, I won’t be crying the blues this time, because he’ll be on several of my tickets. The potential for a wet track makes him even more frightening. (below)

l3698220

MUSKET MAN (Yonagusta- Fortuneqsue/ Fortunate Prospect) PP#2 , 98 Beyer, 20-1 Morning Line

Pros: He is coming off a win in the Illinois Derby where he played more of a stalking role, but I expect him to be closer to the pace in this one. He continues to outrun his pedigree, and hasn’t done much wrong so far. He also has a win over General Quarters in the Tampa Bay Derby. The general consensus describing him is that he is a “tank”- big, not super fast, but keeps on going.

Cons: The pedigree/ class concerns here are massive, as it would clearly appear that he won’t be able to get ten furlongs. He has two wins to his credit from out of nowhere, but hasn’t demonstrated blazing speed, as his top Beyer is below the 100 level. This is usually a red flag. The competition he has won against is questionable, although he was flattered by General Quarters’ win in the Blue Grass. His most recent workout was subpar to say the least. He won’t benefit from a tight inside post, where he is likely to get pinned behind the speed horses to his outside.

Conclusion: As heartwarming of a story as this former $15,000 claimer is, I think he is in way over his head here. People love to use the Illinois Derby winner as a trendy pick. Read: This is not War Emblem. This isn’t even Sweetnorthernsaint. If the pedigree concerns don’t make him a toss at this price, then the sub-100 Beyer over the dirt and poor training certainly do, and the combination of the three is too much for me to bear in a field this deep.

FLYING PRIVATE (Fusaichi Pegasus- Beautiful Treasure/ Unbridled), PP#20, 94 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: His connections benefit from the yoda of horse training, D. Wayne Lukas. Performance-wise, he’s still looking for his first graded win and has only hit the board once in his last four starts.

Cons: Is way outclassed here, as four of these horses finished ahead of him on the dirt in the Arkansas Derby. The only horse in this race he’s beaten was West Side Bernie in a second place finish at Turfway over a synthetic track. Starting out of the dreaded #20 post won’t help his already bleak chances. Obviously, this isn’t going to be a repeat of last year, because he’s no Big Brown.

Conclusion: Aside from Lukas, he doesn’t have much going for him. Too many other horses to like here, this is a big pass for me. But crazier things have happened (Read: Giacomo).

STALKERS:

I WANT REVENGE (Stephen Got Even- Meguial/ Roy) PP#13, 113 Beyer, 3-1 Morning Line Favorite

Pros: He has been sensational since switching to dirt. After earning a 113 Beyer in the 9f Gotham and absolutely crushing that field, he came back to win the Wood Memorial after spotting the field six lengths due to a bad start. He’s shown versatility and a will to win, and his top Beyer is the highest in the field. His pedigree is stacked with stamina, with A.P. Indy blood on his paternal side (which means Seattle Slew too) and South American distance blood and a hint of Secretariat on the other. Early losses to Pioneer of the Nile on synthetic tracks may not be relevant for the Derby, as his figures indicate that he is a different horse on dirt. His final 3/8 in the Wood Memorial came in :36.37, which puts him right in contention, and he overcame everything in that race and never even felt the whip. He was certainly flattered by Mr. Fantasy’s recent win in the Withers, as he demolished that one in the Gotham. His last work went off well at Churchill, as he confidently worked 4f in a blazing :47.1.

Cons: As mentioned before, no horse from the Bold Ruler sire line has won a Kentucky Derby since 1979, so he is at somewhat of a historical disadvantage from a pedigree standpoint even though it looks to be among the most dominant in the field on paper. He’s also only beaten one horse in this field, so there remains some class questions despite the impressive styles in which he has been winning. His jockey, 19 year-old Joe Palamo is talented but will be riding in his first Derby, and the rest of his connections (trainer Jeff Mullins most notably) don’t exactly have the cleanest reputation in the business. As the morning line favorite, he obviously provides the least value. He’s also prone to behavior issues, and has been bit of a head case. Moreover, there could be concerns that his last two dominating efforts took their toll on him, although there hasn’t been any evidence of this in his training.

Conclusion: He is clearly a monster on the dirt, and there’s no getting around what he overcame to win the Wood Memorial under very little urging from Palamo. Looking back on that race, the four to six lengths he gave up at the start cost him enough in his final time and speed figure that he’d probably be in Quality Road’s territory figures-wise with a better trip, and his stalking style figures to work better here than that one’s does. Don’t forget that the 113 Beyer he posted in the Gotham is the best figure here. Very dangerous; ignore the healthy favorite with the fastest figure at your own peril. (below)

Wood Memorial Horse Racing

DUNKIRK (Unbridled’s Song- Secret Status/ A.P. Indy) PP #15, 108 Beyer, 4-1 Morning Line

Pros: His move coming around the final turn in the Florida Derby was arguably the most exciting moment of the season so far, and even though he wasn’t able to hang on and overtake Quality Road in that race, he likely gained valuable seasoning from the race. Moves like that are moves that win Derbys. The track was certainly fast that day as three track records went down, and his placement (seven lengths back in the early going) didn’t help his chances any more than his wide trip around the final turn. Still, he came home in :36.69 for the final 3/8 furlong and an astonishing :24.0 for the final 1/4. His pedigree is among the best in the field, as he is bred up and down for stamina, and is of the Mr. Prospector sire line. The 108 Beyer figure that he earned in the Florida Derby is the second fastest in the field, and he seems poised to improve upon that based on his form in workouts. You have to think that his connections are pleased with this post.

Cons: He did not race as a two-year-old. No horse has won the Derby since Apollo in 1882 that did not race as a two-year-old. There are trends and there are big trends. This falls in the latter category, and seasoning is clearly the main concern here, and moreover, poses the bigger question: If Curlin couldn’t do it, can Dunkirk? He also hasn’t placed ahead of a single horse in the field as of yet. Again, seasoning remains a big concern off of only three career races. His final workout was a bit on the slow side (1:01.2), but remember, this one does his running towards the end of the race, and that could set up well for him.

Conclusion: As I look over all of the factors in this race, he seems to benefit from everything from historical trends (Apollo jinx excluded) to the setup of the pace. The only real question here is seasoning since he has only three career starts and none at two years old, but in my opinion all he has to do is run back to his Florida Derby with a better trip and he’ll win this race, and logic says he should only improve off of that effort, as his 108 Beyer isn’t tops in the field but is well above the historical range. To me, the Apollo curse isn’t as big a deal as it might seem, as the statistic itself is flawed; over the past 93 years, only eight horses have even attempted to run in the Kentucky Derby without starting as a two year-old, and all of them were obscure longshots with the exception of Curlin. From the pedigree to the stalking style and the ability to make an explosive move coming home, he has all of the elements I look for in a Derby winner. His long stride should only help over the final furlong, and I keep watching that Florida Derby replay as he gallops out handily beyond Quality Road. The pick. (below)

dunkirk2-19

PIONEER OF THE NILE (Empire Maker- Star of Goshen/ Lord at War) PP#16 , 96 Beyer, 4-1 Morning Line

Pros: Has been the ultimate professional in winning his first four races, all over synthetic surfaces, and it is clear that he has the heart of a champion and refuses to lose. He’ll try to avenge his sire’s loss in the 2004 Derby, and his sire line (Mr. Prospector-Fappian0-Unbridled-Empire Maker) gives him outstanding stamina. Eclipse Award winning jockey Garrett Gomez chose this mount over Dunkirk, which should speak volumes. He’s worked impressively, although not overly quickly (5f in 1:01, with a strong gallop out), over the dirt at Churchill, but has seemed to prove that the surface switch won’t be an issue. With Bob Baffert on the sidelines, you know he’s in as good of hands as he can be, and he seems to have been the winner of the beauty contest at Churchill this week.

Cons: He hasn’t run an actual race on dirt yet, and his stride seems as though it may be better suited for the turf. To me he is the biggest question mark and wild card in the entire race, as his speed figures in four career races have never topped a 100 Beyer, but, then again, he’s always been on synthetic surfaces (Colonel John anyone?). I didn’t like his eagerness to get to the lead in the Santa Anita Derby; he was very rank and Gomez was physically pulling on the reins to get him into a more settling position. Granted, the colt pulled through with determination, but if he refuses to settle in the Kentucky Derby, he could very well be cooked. Additionally, even though he’s looked pleasing to the eye in his works at Churchill, he hasn’t exactly answered that speed question. Considering Baffert generally works his horses at fast speeds, his workouts were a little perplexing.

Conclusion: I have respect for everything he does, but at the end of the day, I really think he’s going to be slower version of Colonel John. He’s a fine horse, but there is just nothing that jumps out at me that makes me want to back him for the win, especially at these odds. There are just faster and better bred horses in this race on all ends of the spectrum, from the pacesetters, the stalkers and the closers, so regardless of where he chooses to run this race, I just think he’ll have a hard time getting past them at this distance. In case I’m dead wrong, he’ll be on the bottom of a few exotic bets, because I do think he’ll run a strong race and finish in the upper third of the field, and certainly has a better chance to hit the board than many of these horses. He’s just not in my top five, there are too many questions for me with him, not the least of which is the fact that he’s never had real dirt in his face.

GENERAL QUARTERS (Sky Mesa- Ecology/ Unbridled’s Song) PP#12, 102 Beyer, 20-1 Morning Line

Pros: He demonstrated an impressive turn of foot in coming from slightly off the pace in the Blue Grass, covering the final 3/8 in :35.85 over Polytrack, the fastest come home in the field over that distance. His only win on dirt came in February at Tampa Bay, where he beat Musket Man, but that one turned the tables in decisive fashion the next time out, albeit after handing General Quarters a rough trip. His pedigree is the best in the field in the event the track turns up sloppy, and his short stride could gobble up a lot of ground in that event. He’s also the only horse in the field with a victory at Churchill Downs, and his 102 Beyer on polytrack is very respectable.

Cons: He seems to run a lot better on synthetic surfaces than on the dirt, as he was an easily beaten 5th in the Tampa Bay Derby last time out. This leaves questions as to whether he’ll be able to duplicate his closing speed on a new surface. He hasn’t looked like a dirt horse in his workouts at Churchill, although he has been improving steadily. His sire line of Sky Mesa and Pulpit seemed more successful at 9f than at 10f. And honestly, the Blue Grass has been the kiss of death for the winner, especially since Keeneland switched to synthetic. Dominican finished up the track in 2007, and Monba was dead last in 2008.

Conclusion: He seems to fall just above the Musket Man class level, as they’ve split with each other on the dirt, and he’s another low-priced claimer ($20,000) who makes a great story, but is probably in over his head here. He looked good in the Blue Grass and his closing fractions merit a look, but there’s no question that Hold Me Back would have had his number after another furlong. He had a chance to sway me if his form on dirt looked outstanding in his workouts, but that hasn’t been the case. If you like Musket Man, you have to like General Quarters probably a bit better, but it’s pretty easy to put your money against both, and that’s what I’ll be doing.

MINE THAT BIRD (Birdstone- Mining My Own/ Smart Strike), PP#8, 81 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: I can’t really think of any. Finished fourth at Sunland Park last time out, and was twelfth in the BC Juvenile last fall against some of these.

Cons: Really, really seems overmatched here. Observers of his workouts note that he could possibly be “mentally challenged.” He’s the longest shot in the field for good reason. His top Beyer of 81 is abysmal.

Conclusion: The perfect example of Derby Fever, as this horse has no business running against the rest of these. He’s just another body to create a meaningless traffic jam. Reason number 10,000 that the field should be cut down.

ATOMIC RAIN (Smart Strike-Paradise Pond/ Cox’s Ridge) PP#14, 90 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: I don’t see too many here, as he’s a very late addition thanks to some defections. He was fourth in the Wood Memorial and probably would have been second with a better trip.

Cons: He finished off the board in his last two graded attempts, finishing fourth in the Wood Memorial and seventh in the Sam Davis at Tampa Bay. His third place finish in between in a Gulfstream allowance race isn’t getting me too excited.

Conclusion: Simply, there isn’t a lot that stands out here and I don’t see anything to like. Probably in way over his head by every conceivable measure.

CLOSERS

CHOCOLATE CANDY (Candy Ride-Crownette/ Seattle Slew) PP#11 , 95 Beyer, 20-1 Morning Line

Pros: His late-running style could suit him well if the pace is faster than expected. He’s worked well at Churchill and could benefit from the switch to dirt from a pedigree standpoint (damsire is Seattle Slew, enough said). He ran well in a second place finish to Pioneer of the Nile in the Santa Anita Derby, and actually covered the final 3/8 quicker than that one (:36.11). He’s certainly one to watch if things go his way, and should move up on an off-track. His workouts show an improving colt, and he seems speedier on the dirt surface, posting his final 5f work in a confident :59.1. From an appearance standpoint, his coat is blooming beautifully, a sure sign of top fitness.

Cons: The main concern here has been that he is simply not fast enough. The only horse in the past 20 years to win the Derby without previously running over a 100 Beyer got there because of an insane pace meltdown, and that’s unlikely to happen here with much softer pace expectations than that race had. Again, he has yet to run on the dirt, so that statistic doesn’t hold quite as much water as it would for a horse with several dirt starts. He’s also yet to get past Pioneer of the Nile, although I think he’ll like the dirt better.

Conclusion: He seems to have momentum coming into this race and looks to be improving as much as any other horse on the track. I still can’t stop looking at the strong pedigree (there’s that Mr. Prospector sire line again) and his closing figures- he’s probably the strongest pure closer in the field if he gets a good set-up, and I like his chances to show new form on the dirt. The fact that he has been training faster than Pioneer of the Nile helps my separation decision between those two, as I am confident that Chocolate Candy has the better pedigree for this distance. Live for exotics, and an overlay at this price. (below)

chocolatecandy

DESERT PARTY (Street Cry- Sage Cat/ Tabasco Cat) PP#19 , 100-102 Beyer Equivalent, 15-1 Morning Line

Pros: Dubai’s best hope for a Derby win in years comes off a 2nd place finish in the UAE Derby that was better than it looked; Desert Party actually closed admirably to cover the final 3/8 in :36.74 and should gain important fitness from that effort. With stablemate Regal Ransom likely to try to set a hot pace, things could fall into place for this closer. I like his pedigree as well, with influences from the Mr. Prospector line on his sire line and stamina on his dam line as well (any horse with Tabasco Cat influence is going to get a look from me, even though the Cat hasn’t had great success as a dam sire as of yet). His works at Churchill have been visually impressive and quite quick for a horse that seems to have a lot left in the tank (:59.3 for 5f). He actually tried to chase down a horse out for a gallop after his workout had concluded. That makes me think he wants to pass horses, and that’s a good mindset to have!

Cons: There are lots of questions here, such as the overseas trip and the difficulty to compare his speed figures to the rest of the field. Also, top Dubai jockey Frankie Dettori opted to stay across the pond for this one. Why would he do that if he thought he had to chance to win the most famous race in the world? Most concerning is the fact that he starts out of such a wide post, but considering he figures to fall back early, this won’t be as damaging as it would be if he was a speed horse. Still, he’ll have a lot of horses to navigate through from near the back of the pack.

Conclusion: Although a lot of people are jumping on board and he figures to be a bit of a “wise guy horse” Saturday morning, I have a really good feeling about him. He’s flown under the radar but looks to have all of the pieces to pull off the upset here, from the closing style to the pedigree and competitive mentality. He definitely will be in my exotics and outright bets, and he looks like the best chance Godolphin has had to actually win this thing in a long, long time. (below)

903-ap080724023702standaloneprod_affiliate79

WEST SIDE BERNIE (Bernstein- Time Honored/ Gilded Time) PP#1, 101 Beyer, 30-1 Morning Line

Pros: He closed gamely in his last outing, finishing second at Aqueduct in the Wood Memorial. He earned a 101 Beyer in that effort which merits a look. He likes to come from off the pace, and his final 3/8 in that effort came home in :36.55, which isn’t too shabby.

Cons: He’s been beaten on Polytrack by some of the long shots here (Hold Me Back, Flying Private) and his second place finish in the Wood probably wasn’t as good as it looked given the fact that the winner spotted the field six lengths at the start. He’s prone to hanging late in the race. His pedigree is weak compared to the rest of the field, with some sprinting blood on both sides of his immediate family but some stamina influences further back. This is a big step up for him class-wise, and for a horse that wants to close, it doesn’t get much worse than drawing the #1 post.

Conclusion: All indications are that he would need to move up considerably to be a factor here. I’m not as impressed by his Wood Memorial runner-up performance as some are, and his pedigree has to be bottom three in the field as far as wanting the distance. Not for me.

ADVICE (Chapel Road- Word O’Wisdom/ Hennessy) PP#4, 94 Beyer, 30-1 Morning Line

Pros: He closed stoutly in his last outing to win the Lexington over synthetic and earn his spot here, coming from eighth to first in the final half furlong. This was a large improvement over his previous three starts.

Cons: It’s likely that the Lexington took a lot out of him, and even in that win his speed figures leave a lot to be desired against the rest of these; he’ll have to improve vastly upon that effort to factor here and that will be a tall order off of the short rest. His pedigree doesn’t really stack up either, and he certainly looks like a synthetic specialist.

Conclusion: I’m going to look elsewhere, but if the pace is faster than expected, he could grab a piece of the board if he really steps forward from his last race and takes to the dirt. Still, that’s a few too many “ifs” for me, and looking over his overall resume, there are better off-the-pace horses to play.

NOWHERE TO HIDE (Vindication- Stirring/ Seeking the Gold) PP#18, 90 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: He got into the race somehow after the late defection of Win Willy. Welcome! Not sure what flight to put him in, but I figure he’ll be nowher near the leaders, so if he’s going to make a run, it’s going to have to be a late run.

Cons: A disgraceful entrance, as the horse hasn’t even hit the board in three starts since breaking his maiden. He’s at a great disadvantage to the rest of these as he hasn’t been training to run in this race. A bad move overall to enter. Nothing looks interesting about the pedigree either.

Conclusion: He has to be the best bet to finish last simply based on his lack of conditioning and overall lack of speed. Hopefully they scratch him.

DEEP CLOSERS

HOLD ME BACK (Giant’s Causeway- Restraint/ Unbridled’s Song), PP#5 , 97 Beyer, 15-1 Morning Line

Pros: He looked fantastic closing to finish second in the Blue Grass, covering the final 3/8 in :35.97 and closing ground on the winner in the final furlong. He likes to come from way back, but has so far only been successful on synthetic surfaces, so it will be interesting to see how this attempt on the dirt plays out. He’s been training fairly well at Churchill, and would benefit from a faster than expected early pace.

Cons: Despite having perhaps the best closing numbers in the field, it remains to be seen whether or not he is simply a synthetic specialist, as his only try on the dirt ended dismally with a 5th place finish at Aqueduct last year. His pedigree certainly points to an affinity for turf; while his sire was successful on both surfaces, most of his successful offspring have been turf horses, and the same is true for his dam. Additionally, all of the deep closers could be at a disadvantage this year if the pace is soft, as they may lose more ground early than they can make up.

Conclusion: He’s been among the most impressive training at Churchill, posting an reasonable 5f conditioning move in 1:01.3 in his final work, but also passing the beauty contest with flying colors. All indications seem to be that he will take to the dirt, and is probably the most dangerous of the deep closers, which always merits inclusion in exotics just in case the race turns crazy. I don’t think he’s fast enough to win the race unless we see a much faster pace than anticipated, but he’ll definitely be flying late whatever the case. Should be a good price, use underneath in exotics.

MR. HOT STUFF (Tiznow-Sweet Damsel/ Turkoman ) PP#3, 96 Beyer, 30-1 Morning Line

Pros: Showed a strong late kick in closing to hit the board in the Santa Anita Derby and also closed strongly earlier this year in the Sham. Those were both on synthetic surfaces, and his sire line says he should move up on dirt and love the extra distance.

Cons: This is a big step-up for him from a class perspective, and a lot of things would need to go his way for him to factor here. The main concern here is that he is behind the curve mentally and needs a bit more experience to realize his full potential. He’s a full brother to Colonel John. On second thought, maybe that’s a pro…

Conclusion: This is a colt with a lot of upside, but I don’t think he’s quite fast enough to compete here at this point in his career. He stands a chance to hit the board if the pace completely disintegrates, but I don’t think that is a likely scenario. Still, he will surely be flying down the stretch, and I wouldn’t say hitting the board is unthinkable, just unlikely in a field this classed.

SUMMER BIRD (Birdstone-Hong Kong Squall/ Summer Squall ) PP#17, 95 Beyer, 50-1 Morning Line

Pros: He is certainly bred for distance, although one wonders if this race is actually too short for him. His sire Birdstone stopped Smarty Jones’ quest for the Triple Crown at the wire in the 12f Belmont Stakes in 2004. Summer Bird himself put in an impressive performance in his last outing, flying down the stretch while finishing third in the Arkansas Derby, running the final 3/8 in :36.79, and looking likely to overtake the leaders in another half a furlong. Coming from the Mr. Prospector line, he’s a live longshot to hit the board.

Cons: He likes to give up a lot of lengths early and then make a big late move, but often those types of runners run out of time in softer paced Derby races, which this one could very well be. There are serious class concerns as well with this one, as he hasn’t beaten a single horse in the field and will need a career best effort to factor here. Above all, with no Beyer figure above 95 on the dirt, is he anywhere near fast enough to matter in this race? In his workouts, he has looked far too slow to factor.

Conclusion: To me, just like his sire, he looks to be more of a Belmont horse than a Derby horse. He figures to improve and I like him to close stoutly and finish in the top half of the field, but let’s be honest, he needs a Spanish Chestnut-like pace meltdown to hit the board here and even then there are probably several closers with more pure speed than he has. Keep your eye on him in the Belmont, otherwise, I think this is a lot to ask for him here unless he goes off at over 50-1, in which case I’d still keep my money in the show pool and on the last line of the superfecta as far as this guy goes.

PROJECTED ORDER OF FINISH:

  1. Dunkirk
  2. I Want Revenge
  3. Desert Party
  4. Friesan Fire
  5. Chocolate Candy
  6. Pioneer of the Nile
  7. Hold Me Back
  8. Regal Ransom
  9. General Quarters
  10. Summer Bird
  11. Papa Clem
  12. Mr. Hot Stuff
  13. Musket Man
  14. West Side Bernie
  15. Advice
  16. Flying Private
  17. Atomic Rain
  18. Join in the Dance
  19. Mine That Bird
  20. Nowhere to Hide

HOW TO BET $100 ON THE KENTUCKY DERBY

$2 Exacta Box: Dunkirk, I Want Revenge, Desert Party ($12)

$6 Exacta Box: Dunkirk, I Want Revenge ($12)

$1 Exacta Key: Dunkirk, I Want Revenge, Desert Party/ Freisan Fire, Chocolate Candy, Pioneer of the Nile, Hold Me Back ($12)

$1 Exacta Key: Friesan Fire/ Dunkirk, I Want Revenge, Desert Party, Chocolate Candy ($4)

$10 Win, Place, Show: Dunkirk ($30)

$10 Place, Show:  I Want Revenge ($20)

$10 Show: Desert Party ($10)

No. 9 Park (Boston, MA)

Posted April 19, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Food

On a recent trip to Boston over Easter weekend, I was lucky enough to have the chance to dine at another four-star restaurant, No. 9 Park. The restaurant is named for its address on Park Street, and sits with impressive views over the Boston Common and Public Gardens. The small dining room is dimly lit but feels upbeat and modern. The most notable aspect of this establishment besides the great food is the overall feel and attitude, which is as unpretentious as can be. Our waiter had no problem mixing up food and wine options to suit our preferences and was very down to earth and talkative.

There are two main tasting options at No. 9 Park, a seven course chef’s menu for $96 or a three course prix fixe menu for $65. Alternatively, the a la carte options include an array of appetizers and entrees for $19 and $39 respectively, and these are the options that make up the prix fixe menu as well. On this particular night, neither of us was in the mood for the full seven course tasting menu, but wanted to sample some of the items, and the prix fixe menu seemed to make the most sense. I noticed that the braised beef short rib that I had wanted for my entree was available on the full tasting menu but was not offered a la carte/ prix fixe. No problem, as the chef gladly substituted it in as my entree for my three-course prix fixe at no additional charge. I liked the laid back nature of No. 9 Park, as the place doesn’t take itself too seriously, but instead creates focused and innovative contemporary French cuisine without a hint of pretentiousness. Our waiter, after seeing that we were struggling with making a wine decision, offered to pair wines with each of our prix fixe courses on the fly, and this was after sending over two complimentary flutes of sparkling wine. The cost for the wine service was also impressively reasonable.

First Course: Prune Stuffed Gnocchi with Foie Gras, Toasted Almonds and Vin Santo.

This appetizer is a famous dish at No. 9 Park, so we both decided to get a full portion, which consisted of five handmade gnocchi stuffed with rich prunes and topped with a smoked foie gras. The course would be incredibly sweet and rich without the foie gras topping, which added fanstastic balance, while the almonds added a pleasant crunch contrast to the soft, handmade gnocchi. The portion size you see below was quite substantial, and I was assured that the seven course menu includes a much smaller portion; it would be difficult to eat much more than one or two courses after eating this. Having said that, it was so delicious that I’m glad we opted for the smaller menu and thus, the larger portion.

img_01921

Second Course: Braised Beef Short Rib, Couer de Bouef, Morel Mushroom Bread Pudding

The shortrib itself was perfectly braised and so tender that I rarely needed to use a knife to cut the meat. The flavors were concentrated and intense, with gamey elements adding complexity to the typical roasted beef flavors. Rare slices of beef heart and a delicious mushroom pudding added additional balance, but the meat itself here was close to perfection. Again, I felt that the portion size was enormous. My wife ordered the guinea hen with smoked bacon, spring greens and morel mushrooms, which she found to be very unique. Aside from the tender breast of guinea hen, there was an additional side of hen wrapped in bacon.

img_0194

img_01932

Desserts: Nougat Glace with Salted Carame, Whipped Chocolate Ganache, Peanut Powder/ Liquid Chocolate

img_0195

img_0196YUM!

WINE OF THE MONTH- APRIL

Posted April 16, 2009 by melliott
Categories: Wine

I haven’t featured anything from Italy lately, and I tasted this wine recently and was very surprised by its soft, elegant structure combined with its food-pairing potential. I’m always looking for bargain Italian wines because they are hard to find in my opinion; Italy is obviously capable of making some of the best wine on the planet, but the best Brunellos and Super-Tuscans can really push their weight onto the wallet, and are usually closer to $100 than $50. My job is to find you affordable, available and of course, delicious bottles of wine while keeping things as diverse as possible. I think you’ll be happy with this selection, especially with a heaping bowl of homemade spaghetti.

68d40405-45db-4373-bf8a-f1ff389eb67e

LA BRACCESCA VINO NOBILE DI MONTEPULCIANO SANTA PIA VIGNETO 2004, 89 Points, $30, 1660 cases produced

Soft aromas of red cherry, mineral, rose petal and vanilla. Smokey, almost floral red cherry hints are elegant and balanced above notes of vanilla, sweet spice and herbs. Impressive length, delicious. Firm tannic grip with a hint of chalky mineral lingering.